SteuerGo FAQs

(2022) What evidence is required?

To receive the tax reduction, you must observe one condition:

You must obtain an invoice from the service provider as proof of expenditure, and you may only pay this invoice by bank transfer to their account. Ensure that the invoice separates labour and material costs. Only labour costs, as well as machine and travel costs including the VAT on them, are eligible for tax benefits. However, VAT does not need to be shown separately; you may add it to the labour costs.

It is not necessary to attach the bank statement to the tax return. However, in case of doubt, the tax officer may request it. Amounts paid by standing order, direct debit, or online banking are recognised in conjunction with the bank statement. Cash payments are not recognised.

The condition of bank transfer still applies. Invoices paid in cash will not be recognised.

Household-related services also include home care and support for persons in need of care by mobile care services or self-employed carers. Since 2009, it is no longer necessary to prove the need for care and a care level (until 2016) or a care grade (from 2017).

If you do not yet have a current service charge statement or a separate certificate according to § 35 a EStG for 2022 from your property management, this is not a problem. It is permissible to claim the total expenses for the tax year in which the statement is received by the tenant. You therefore take the most recent service charge statement you have – presumably from 2021 – and claim these costs in the tax year 2022. All tenants and property owners who have not yet received the current certificate according to § 35 a EStG for 2022 can proceed in this way!

All private individuals who have commissioned craftsmen or service providers claim the expenses in the tax year in which they paid the corresponding invoice themselves.

 

In 2019, the Federal Fiscal Court unfortunately ruled against the generous stance of the tax authorities that the tax reduction according to § 35a EStG is only granted for expenses incurred by a taxpayer for their own accommodation in a home or for their own care. However, the tax benefit is excluded for expenses incurred for another person, i.e. when children cover the costs for their parents (BFH ruling of 3.4.2019, VI R 19/17).

A few months after the BFH ruling, the Berlin-Brandenburg Fiscal Court also dealt with the assumption of care costs for a parent. This time, however, it was not about covering the costs for inpatient care, i.e. accommodation in a home, but about covering the costs for outpatient care. The FG ruled as follows: § 35a EStG favours - if at all - only expenses for the outpatient care of relatives in the taxpayer's own household (i.e. the carer's), not for the outpatient care of relatives in their household (BFH ruling of 11.12.2019, 3 K 3210/19). However, a revision was explicitly allowed at that time. And now the positive BFH ruling is available.

Currently, the Federal Fiscal Court has ruled as follows: The tax reduction according to § 35a para. 2 sentence 2 first half-sentence EStG can also be claimed by taxpayers who incur expenses for the outpatient care and support of a third party. Consequently, children can deduct the costs for outpatient care of their parents if they have borne the costs. This also applies if the care and support services are not provided in the taxpayer's own household but in the household of the person being cared for or supported (BFH ruling of 12.4.2022, VI R 2/20).

However, the BFH also complicates matters, as it upholds its above-mentioned ruling from 2019. It distinguishes between covering the costs for inpatient care (= still not deductible) and covering the costs for outpatient care (= deductible), where in the second case it depends on who concluded the care contract. Only if the payer, usually daughter or son, is contractually obliged, i.e. pays for their own debt, are the costs deductible. However, if payment is made for the debt of the person being cared for, i.e. father or mother, because they concluded the care contract, it is a tax-irrelevant third-party expense.